Re: GNOME 2.0 conversation



On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 08:42:26PM -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> 
> Sam TH <sam uchicago edu> writes: 
> > However, about GNOME 2.0, the board members, etc seemed to punt in the
> > last discussion.  However, this issue does need to be moved forward in
> > some way, if only to begin to develop criteria for determining the
> > contents of GNOME office in GNOME 2.0.  
> > 
> > Hopefully the discussion can generate more light and less heat this
> > time.  
> >            
> 
> If you mean the GO vs. OpenOffice discussion, the board did make a
> final decision to just include both and not worry about trying to
> decide this issue for or against either suite in any way.

Perhaps I missed the minutes of that meeting, but I never heard about
that decision.  It's good to know now, though.  
           
	sam th		     
	sam uchicago edu
	http://www.abisource.com/~sam/
	GnuPG Key:  
	http://www.abisource.com/~sam/key

Attachment: pgpOYUwiQkmLf.pgp
Description: PGP signature



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]