Re: OO as GNOME software (topic change)
- From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- To: "John R. Sheets" <dusk ravendusk org>
- Cc: gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: OO as GNOME software (topic change)
- Date: 16 Feb 2001 14:59:27 -0500
"John R. Sheets" <dusk ravendusk org> writes:
> ...etc. All GNOME apps, if they are to _be_ "GNOME apps", should be
> judged against the same set of criteria. Of course, there's nothing
> wrong with runner-up status either, i.e., "GNOMEish apps", although
> presumably that would mean those apps were not included in the
> official GNOME distribution.
>
I really think that if we wait until OpenOffice actually asks to be in
a release, and then discuss how to do that (e.g. same as the "extra
apps" add-on, or whatever), then we'll find that there isn't much
disagreement. It's the metaphysical questions where we aren't sure
what they mean that create long mailing list threads. ;-)
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]