Re: Intolerable CVS behaviour
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: Tomasz Kloczko <kloczek rudy mif pg gda pl>
- Cc: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>, Miguel de Icaza <miguel ximian com>, Tomasz K³oczko <kloczek pld org pl>, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: Intolerable CVS behaviour
- Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 09:55:11 -0500
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 03:05:44PM +0100, Tomasz Kloczko wrote:
> OK. You have right about my fault.
Okay, so I assume you understand the problem, I suggest we reenable
your CVS account. But please learn from this episode.
> But look ones agan on my changes. Is it correct (in spe) or not. If I
> remove on this big change some files I want apologize.
> But if this changes is correct (at all) and if something require fix IMHO
> is better fix this instead reverte rhis.
> I'm not XLM specialist but I know very well autoconf/automake abilities
> and twings which I know.
Okay on technical standpoint:
- this change is right or at least in principle is
- but I expected to do this when creating a new CVS module
when starting the next version
- I don't want to do it now because I don't want to loose history
the only way to not loose CVS history properly and move file is
by creating a new module.
- the existing autoconf/automake stuff of gnome-xml is really complex
because it creates tar.gz with the subdirectory even if it
doesn't exists in CVS.
- the fact that you didn't understand the context of this complexity
is no excuse for deciding on your own to change it.
> Yes this is my mistake. I'm not read before HACKING documment.
> But ones more .. look on this change and evaluate them and simple say is
> it correct or not.
It looks correct from a narrowed point of view, it would have lost
CVS history, and from what I have seen would have broken completely
the Windows build and Makefiles [1]. You had very little understanding of
the context. This is the main common mistake when someone tries to
provide fixes for a project it doesn't knows well. The very first thing
is to ask beforehand if you have direct commit access.
Daniel
[1] and currently my user base for Windows has outgrown the Gnome one,
I get more 'good' patches from the other side, probably because
they were not stuck to libxml1. Not breaking the Windows build is
really important to me right now.
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/
veillard redhat com | libxml Gnome XML toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]