Re: control-center reorganization in CVS
- From: Chema Celorio <chema ximian com>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: control-center reorganization in CVS
- Date: 05 Jul 2001 19:29:19 -0500
On 05 Jul 2001 18:49:00 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
>
> Chema Celorio <chema ximian com> writes:
>
> > On 05 Jul 2001 16:44:52 +0200, Martin Baulig wrote:
> > > And /me is still trying to understand why this rename was neccessarry at all.
> >
> > I'll put a simple example (there where lots of cases like this)
> > We had :
> >
> > a) cvs/control-center/control-center/
> > and
> > b) cvs/control-center/new-control-center
> >
> > We neeed to rename "b" and call it "a", but "a" is beeing used by the
> > stable branch. There can only be one "control-center" directory in cvs.
> > We had about 12 directories that had "-new" in their name.
>
> Not that it really helps, but in case this wasn't clear, the right
> thing to do was not to create new-* directories in the first
> place, but simply:
>
> a) Branch
> b) Change (remove and add files, etc.) the control-center/control-center
> directory in place.
>
/me nods twice
yes, but this was before my time. Dunno who did it, and it does not
matter anymore but i am confident that whoever did it will not do it
again.
regards,
Chema
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]