Re: control-center reorganization in CVS
- From: Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik Sun COM>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: Chema Celorio <chema ximian com>, Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs noisehavoc org>, Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Seth Nickell <snickell stanford edu>, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: control-center reorganization in CVS
- Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2001 18:01:12 +0100 (BST)
On 5 Jul 2001, Owen Taylor wrote:
>
> Not that it really helps, but in case this wasn't clear, the right
> thing to do was not to create new-* directories in the first
> place, but simply:
>
> a) Branch
> b) Change (remove and add files, etc.) the control-center/control-center
> directory in place.
>
> Now, if you have a single branch in CVS with two different histories
> for the same file, you are going to have to drastic measures
> like creating a new module, or loose one of those histories,
> but can we hope that this will never happen again?
>
ehhhh... I think making a new module just to "cover up" gross things
having happened in cvs is not the way to go. IMHO we need to choose
between:
a) live with the new-* directories, usng cvs delete and repository
copying to create a consistent source there
b) consolidate the sources to the old directory, using repository
copy for non-conflicting files and add a suffix (-new, 2,
whatever) for those that conflict and cvs delete anything that
isn't needed.
> Regards,
> Owen
>
Sander
One day a tortoise will learn to fly
-- Terry Pratchett, 'Small Gods'
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]