Re: GNOME 2.0 Schedule



On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Seth Nickell wrote:

> > I'm really starting to think that we should replace huge chunks of the
> > UI for 2.2 (perhaps some chunks in intermediate releases such as
> > 2.0.1), but we have _got_ to avoid that for 2.0 itself, IMHO.
>
> see seperate message about rewriting with usability input ;-)
>
> > So Stephen is right - we need a list of sub-tasks in each major
> > component, e.g. "get the pager/tasklist working again," and who is
> > doing them, and we need that list kept updated. Who owns this sort of
> > issue on the release team?
>
> it would be great if we could track these on bugzilla...that would
> provide a very good mechanism for figuring out how much work we have on
> the core for GNOME2.

So Jeff is working on such a document, maybe he could work with Telsa to
track these issues in bugzilla?

----------------------------------------------------
name:    Jamin Philip Gray
email:   jgray writeme com
icq:     1361499
aim:     jamingray47
web:     http://DoLinux.dyn.dhs.org

Life would be so much easier if we could just look at the source code.
        -- Dave Olson






[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]