Re: GNOME 2.0 Schedule
- From: Jamin Philip Gray <jgray writeme com>
- To: Seth Nickell <snickell stanford edu>
- Cc: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik sun com>, Stephen Browne <stephen browne sun com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs noisehavoc org>, <gnome-2-0-list gnome org>, <gnome-hackers gnome org>, GNOME-2 Release Team <gnome2-release-team gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GNOME 2.0 Schedule
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 10:53:14 -0500 (CDT)
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Seth Nickell wrote:
> > I'm really starting to think that we should replace huge chunks of the
> > UI for 2.2 (perhaps some chunks in intermediate releases such as
> > 2.0.1), but we have _got_ to avoid that for 2.0 itself, IMHO.
>
> see seperate message about rewriting with usability input ;-)
>
> > So Stephen is right - we need a list of sub-tasks in each major
> > component, e.g. "get the pager/tasklist working again," and who is
> > doing them, and we need that list kept updated. Who owns this sort of
> > issue on the release team?
>
> it would be great if we could track these on bugzilla...that would
> provide a very good mechanism for figuring out how much work we have on
> the core for GNOME2.
So Jeff is working on such a document, maybe he could work with Telsa to
track these issues in bugzilla?
----------------------------------------------------
name: Jamin Philip Gray
email: jgray writeme com
icq: 1361499
aim: jamingray47
web: http://DoLinux.dyn.dhs.org
Life would be so much easier if we could just look at the source code.
-- Dave Olson
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]