Re: GNOME 2.7/2.8 Proposed Schedule
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: Markus Bertheau <twanger bluetwanger de>
- Cc: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>, Gnome Hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>, GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, Binding Hackers <language-bindings gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GNOME 2.7/2.8 Proposed Schedule
- Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 12:55:33 +0200
On Sat, 2004-04-24 at 10:54, Markus Bertheau wrote:
> ÷ óÂÔ, 24.04.2004, × 05:56, Jeff Waugh ÐÉÛÅÔ:
>
> > Here's a cal(1) rendition of the schedule which you can quote in replies. :)
>
> There's no "Patch review" and "Bugzilla cleaning" period
But it's _always_ patch review and bugzilla cleaning time. I'm sure
maintainers will always like it if people
- review current bugs and present overall status (Matthias Clasen is the
king of doing this, for instance).
- review patches to make sure they a) commit without problems b) work.
As I've said before I think it's a good idea to hand some of this
responsibility/workload to official co-maintainers. Giving
responsibility makes people take responsibility. But none of us have any
way to force maintainers to do this.
--
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
murrayc murrayc com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]