Re: GNOME 2.7/2.8 Proposed Schedule
- From: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
- To: Markus Bertheau <twanger bluetwanger de>
- Cc: GNOME Hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>, GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, Binding Hackers <language-bindings gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GNOME 2.7/2.8 Proposed Schedule
- Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 21:09:17 +1000
<quote who="Markus Bertheau">
> В Сбт, 24.04.2004, в 05:56, Jeff Waugh пишет:
>
> > Here's a cal(1) rendition of the schedule which you can quote in
> > replies. :)
>
> There's no "Patch review" and "Bugzilla cleaning" period - A lot of good
> patches sleep in bugzilla and GNOME loses a lot of potential maintainers
> that could lift the load of the current maintainers. I think it's a worthy
> goal for 2.7 to tackle.
Hi,
My first thought is that patch review and bugzilla cleaning are open-ended
tasks worked on between the bugsquad and maintainers throughout the process.
It sure needs more *attention*, but I'm not sure it needs more *process*,
which is what the schedule and release team do. ;-)
So I would kinda back away from enshrining these things in process (*unless*
the bugsquad wants it!), but we really do need to figure out a good way to
encourage these things. Perhaps the bugsquad could pay special attention to
patch bugs on certain bug days?
[ This is not a final answer, only my opinion, etc. :-) ]
Thanks,
- Jeff
--
GVADEC 2004: Kristiansand, Norway http://2004.guadec.org/
"If I had an inch for every penis size spam I'd recieved..." - Luis
Villa
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]