Re: Which is the state of my proposal of use bugzilla?
- From: Michael Twomey <michael twomey ireland sun com>
- To: Carlos Perelló Marín <carlos gnome-db org>
- Cc: Chema Celorio <chema ximian com>,GNOME i18n list <gnome-i18n gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Which is the state of my proposal of use bugzilla?
- Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2001 16:34:48 +0100
Hi,
that seems ok to me, I agree with that option.
thanks,
mick
Carlos Perelló Marín wrote:
> El d_ 01 Aug 2001 13:50:03 +0100, Michael Twomey escribi_
>
>>Hi,
>> Looking at the examples I see the problems you are talking about.
>>
>>The main issues I see are:
>>
>>1. Email notification
>>We could use the language aliases as the default "assigned to" so the
>>bugs got mailed to those. Or special aliases could be set up under the
>>gnome.org tree (actually why isn't there an l10n-es@gnome.org anyway?
>>Seems useful to me to have an 'official' alias :)).
>>
>>2. Product/Component/Version
>>I think using the Version as an identifier other than the version of
>>Gnome is a bad idea since it defeats the point of having the version
>>number. I think it is important that people can log against Gnome 2.0,
>>1.4 or CVS since it makes it much easier to track down the bug/missing
>>translation if you know which version of the software you are dealing with.
>>
>>I can see a few possibilities here or breaking up the names:
>>
>>Product | Module
>>a. gnome-libs, etc. | l10n-de, l10n-es...
>>b. Localization | l10n-all, l10n-de, l10n-es...
>>c. l10n-de, l10n-es... | gnome-libs, gnome-core...
>>
>>I favour option (b) since I think it balances neatly between having too
>>much mail from very broad categories and having too many categories
>>which makes tracking/logging/finding bugs hard.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> Excuse me, I forgot to send an email here. Yesterday, Chema, kmaraas and
> me were talking about this issue at IRC.
>
>
> We decide use the option (c) but only with the more active projects and
> if we see that the users notify its bugs there and use
> bugzilla/bug-buddy, then this configuration will be useful. If those
> test "products" are not used, then we should use something like option
> (b).
>
>
>>Any thoughts?
>>
>>
>
> Sorry for the delay.
>
>
>>mick
>>
>>
>>Carlos Perelló Marín wrote:
>>
>>
>>>El d_ 31 Jul 2001 16:32:54 +0100, Michael Twomey escribi_
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>> Does anyone know what has happened with this? Have the categories been
>>>>set up or are there still problems?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Well, Chema has said me that he does not have any idea how to solve our
>>>problem :-(
>>>
>>>
>>>I'm playing with bugzilla now and I have seen two possibilities:
>>>
>>>This one:
>>>http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58343
>>>
>>>Or this one:
>>>http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58344
>>>
>>>We only have one problem. The email notification :-(, we can only have
>>>one email address.
>>>
>>>Other possibility could be to had other l10n specific bugzilla...
>>>
>>>
>>>Ideas?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>thanks,
>>>> Michael
>>>>
>>>>Carlos Perelló Marín wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>El d_ 21 Jul 2001 12:58:00 -0500, Chema Celorio escribi_
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>On 21 Jul 2001 19:55:10 +0200, Carlos Perelló Marín wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I don't think so, but we could put all the modules inside l10n-es.
>>>>>>>>Will that work for translators ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I don't know what are you telling me exactly...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Perhaps are you telling me that we could use something like a symbolic
>>>>>>>link?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>I mean that we can put all the translation bugs for each locale in a
>>>>>>component and not need to have one component for each module. So you
>>>>>>will have Transltions->es Translations->it and inside each component
>>>>>>translation bugs for all programs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>This way, how could we get our bugs? I mean, If I'm only translating the
>>>>>Ximian Setup Tools, Could I get only my bugs if we put all bugs at the
>>>>>same level?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>>gnome-i18n mailing list
>>>>>>gnome-i18n@gnome.org
>>>>>>http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>--
>>>>>Carlos Perelló Marín
>>>>>mailto:carlos@gnome-db.org
>>>>>mailto:carlos@hispalinux.es
>>>>>http://www.gnome-db.org
>>>>>http://www.Hispalinux.es
>>>>>Valencia - Spain
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>gnome-i18n mailing list
>>>>>gnome-i18n@gnome.org
>>>>>http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>Michael Twomey
>>>>These opinions are my own and do not represent Sun unless otherwise stated.
>>>>Sun Microsystems, Dublin, 8199164, x19164
>>>>"Fly my little Makefiles! Fly!"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>gnome-i18n mailing list
>>>>gnome-i18n@gnome.org
>>>>http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>--
>>>Carlos Perelló Marín
>>>mailto:carlos@gnome-db.org
>>>mailto:carlos@hispalinux.es
>>>http://www.gnome-db.org
>>>http://www.Hispalinux.es
>>>Valencia - Spain
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>gnome-i18n mailing list
>>>gnome-i18n@gnome.org
>>>http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
>>>
>>>
>>
>>--
>>Michael Twomey
>>These opinions are my own and do not represent Sun unless otherwise stated.
>>Sun Microsystems, Dublin, 8199164, x19164
>>"Fly my little Makefiles! Fly!"
>>
>>
> --
> Carlos Perelló Marín
> mailto:carlos@gnome-db.org
> mailto:carlos@hispalinux.es
> http://www.gnome-db.org
> http://www.Hispalinux.es
> Valencia - Spain
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-i18n mailing list
> gnome-i18n@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
>
--
Michael Twomey
These opinions are my own and do not represent Sun unless otherwise stated.
Sun Microsystems, Dublin, 8199164, x19164
"Fly my little Makefiles! Fly!"
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]