Re: Added gtkhtml branch



El dom, 25-11-2001 a las 17:47, R.I.P. Deaddog escribió:
> Hi,
> 
> As title -- just found that gtkhtml has gnome 1.x branch
> too, and modified status pages accordingly. Besides, gal
> seems to be branched as well, but that's more confusing.
> I found 2 likely branch names:

gal is not branched for us. I mean, the gal-devel-branch should not be
translated, the author told me that we should use HEAD, he will update
the translations.

The gal-2 branch is (I think) the started port to GNOME 2.0, I don't
know if we should use it until it's moved to HEAD...


Bye
> 
>    Existing Tags:
>    GAL_0_18_1                      (revision: 1.186)
>    gal-devel-branch                (branch: 1.185.2)
>    GAL_DEVEL_BRANCH_BASE           (revision: 1.186)
>    GAL_0_18                        (revision: 1.184)
>    GAL_0_17                        (revision: 1.182)
>    GAL_0_16                        (revision: 1.180)
>    GAL_0_15                        (revision: 1.166)
>    GAL_0_14                        (revision: 1.160)
>    gal-2                           (branch: 1.158.2)
>    GAL_2_ANCHOR                    (revision: 1.158)
>    [......]
> 
> Which one indicates the real branching point? gal-2
> or gal-devel-branch? Or both are valid branch point,
> but gal-2 is for gnome-2.x and gal-devel-branch is
> for gnome-1.x ? Or...... well, I'm puzzled.
> 
> Abel
-- 
Carlos Perelló Marín
mailto:carlos@gnome-db.org
http://www.gnome-db.org
http://www.Hispalinux.es
Valencia - Spain

PGP signature



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]