Re: Added gtkhtml branch
- From: Carlos Perelló Marín <carlos gnome-db org>
- To: "R.I.P. Deaddog" <maddog linuxhall org>
- Cc: GNOME i18n list <gnome-i18n gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Added gtkhtml branch
- Date: 25 Nov 2001 17:53:33 +0100
El dom, 25-11-2001 a las 17:47, R.I.P. Deaddog escribió:
> Hi,
>
> As title -- just found that gtkhtml has gnome 1.x branch
> too, and modified status pages accordingly. Besides, gal
> seems to be branched as well, but that's more confusing.
> I found 2 likely branch names:
gal is not branched for us. I mean, the gal-devel-branch should not be
translated, the author told me that we should use HEAD, he will update
the translations.
The gal-2 branch is (I think) the started port to GNOME 2.0, I don't
know if we should use it until it's moved to HEAD...
Bye
>
> Existing Tags:
> GAL_0_18_1 (revision: 1.186)
> gal-devel-branch (branch: 1.185.2)
> GAL_DEVEL_BRANCH_BASE (revision: 1.186)
> GAL_0_18 (revision: 1.184)
> GAL_0_17 (revision: 1.182)
> GAL_0_16 (revision: 1.180)
> GAL_0_15 (revision: 1.166)
> GAL_0_14 (revision: 1.160)
> gal-2 (branch: 1.158.2)
> GAL_2_ANCHOR (revision: 1.158)
> [......]
>
> Which one indicates the real branching point? gal-2
> or gal-devel-branch? Or both are valid branch point,
> but gal-2 is for gnome-2.x and gal-devel-branch is
> for gnome-1.x ? Or...... well, I'm puzzled.
>
> Abel
--
Carlos Perelló Marín
mailto:carlos@gnome-db.org
http://www.gnome-db.org
http://www.Hispalinux.es
Valencia - Spain
PGP signature
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]