Re: Bug #115289



On 2003-08-26(Tue) 23:25:35 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> Sorry, I agree with Christian on this point. There is a time for making
> these changes, and we are far beyond it. We are doing a 2.4 final release in
> about 15 days, and are beyond all meaningful freezes along the way.
> 
> These kinds of things need to be picked up much earlier in the process.
> 
> Sorry, but it will have to wait for 2.4.1, if it's appropriate for 2.4 at
> all. On i18n issues, Christian and Kjartan are our first points of
> reference; if they feel that a large change is not appropriate balanced
> against the i18n gains, then we have to listen.

I never meant to put the change in before 2.4.0 release. It's definitely
not desirable. I'd completely agree on this point. What I disagree is,
to not making improvement at all for all 2.4.x releases.

Abel



> 
> - Jeff
> 
> -- 
> linux.conf.au 2004: Adelaide, Australia         http://lca2004.linux.org.au/
>  
>    "You know, the crunchy, folk-singer part of me wants to believe that a
>      performance is a dialogue, but I can't hear a fucking thing you're
>                           saying." - Ani DiFranco
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-i18n mailing list
> gnome-i18n@gnome.org
> http://lists.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n

-- 
Abel Cheung
Linux counter #256983   | http://counter.li.org
GPG Key: (0xC67186FF)   | http://deaddog.org/gpg.asc
Key fingerprint: 671C C7AE EFB5 110C D6D1  41EE 4152 E1F1 C671 86FF

PGP signature



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]