Re: Panjabi or Punjabi? (fwd)
- From: Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh sharif edu>
- To: GNOME i18n list <gnome-i18n gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Panjabi or Punjabi? (fwd)
- Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 13:07:03 +0330 (IRT)
I asked about Panjabi<->Punjabi on the Unicode mailing list, and these
were the answers. This means that the correct and official spelling is
"Panjabi".
roozbeh
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 18:04:53 +0530
From: rajesh@inflibnet.ac.in
To: Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh@sharif.edu>
Subject: Re: Panjabi or Punjabi?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roozbeh Pournader" <roozbeh@sharif.edu>
To: "Unicode List" <unicode@unicode.org>
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 1:30 PM
Subject: Panjabi or Punjabi?
>
> I just found a difference between online reference on official ISO 639
> names of the "pa" language.
>
> <http://ftp.ics.uci.edu/pub/ietf/http/related/iso639.txt> mentions:
>
> pa Punjabi
>
> while <http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/englangn.html> says:
>
> Panjabi pendjabi pan pa
>
> Which spelling is the official ISO 639 one?
Panjabi................pan
is the official code as per the ISO 639-2.
Rajesh Chandrakar
Scientific and Technical Officer
Information & Library Network (NFLIBNET) Centre,
P.B. No. 4116, Navaragpura,
Ahmedabad, Gujarat
India - 380 009
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 16:44:56 +0000
From: Michael Everson <everson@evertype.com>
To: unicode@unicode.org
Subject: Re: Panjabi or Punjabi?
Oxford lists Panjabi as a variant spelling of Punjabi. The
transliteration of the native designation is Pañjâbî (with macrons
not circumflexes).
--
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 13:34:45 -0600
From: Peter_Constable@sil.org
To: Unicode List <unicode@unicode.org>
Subject: Re: Panjabi or Punjabi?
On 02/21/2003 02:00:03 AM Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
>I just found a difference between online reference on official ISO 639
>names of the "pa" language.
>
><http://ftp.ics.uci.edu/pub/ietf/http/related/iso639.txt> mentions:
>
>pa Punjabi
>
>while <http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/englangn.html> says:
>
>Panjabi pendjabi pan pa
>
>Which spelling is the official ISO 639 one?
Considering that the latter URL is the official site for ISO 639 and the
earlier one is not, I think the answer should be clear.
- Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Constable
Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Tel: +1 972 708 7485
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]