Re: seahorse and seahorse-plugins

[Claude Paroz <claude 2xlibre net>]

Le samedi 27 septembre 2008 à 17:45 +0200, Christian Rose a écrit :
> On 9/27/08, Claude Paroz <claude 2xlibre net> wrote:
> > Le vendredi 29 août 2008 à 08:49 +0200, Olav Vitters a écrit :
> >
> > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:54:56PM +0200, Claude Paroz wrote:
> >  > > Le jeudi 28 août 2008 à 22:45 +0200, Daniel Nylander a écrit :
> >  > > > Good afternoon,
> >  > > >
> >  > > > I'm about to finish the Swedish translations for 2.24 but ran inte some
> >  > > > problems along the way.
> >  > > > Where is the module seahorse-plugins located? Can't find it in seahorse
> >  > >
> >  > > It is below seahorse trunk.
> >  > > However, I hope it will be moved in its own module, because it is really
> >  > > non standard currently.
> >  >
> >  > I often forget about tickets. Just email gnome-sysadmin when that
> >  > happens.
> >
> >
> > Could this problem be addressed now that 2.24 rush is behind us?
> 
> Hmm. I'm confused...
> 
> The only Subversion request I know about for the 'seahorse' module was
> RT#4499, sent to svnmaster gnome org by Stef Walter
> <stef memberwebs com> at March 17, 2008. The topic was "Request for
> SVN dump of 'seahorse' repository".
> 
> Excerpt from the discussion in that ticket, on June 30, 2008:
> 
> ---
>   > On Mon Mar 17 01:49:23 2008, stef memberwebs com wrote:
>   >> I'd like to request an SVN dump of the 'seahorse' GNOME repository.
>   >>
>   >> This is the first step in splitting the main seahorse program, and its
>   >> modules into two separate projects, for easier maintenance and
>   > refactoring.
>   >> Please let me know if there's any other information you need, or if
>   >> there's some way for me to go about this directly.
>   >>
>   >> Thanks for everything!
>   >>
>   >> Stef Walter
>   >>
>   > Can we close this now?
> 
>   Yup. It's no longer needed and Adam Schreiber had it resolved in a
>   satisfactory way.
> 
>   Cheers,
> 
>   Stef
> ---
> 
> So I thought this had been resolved, and closed the ticket. Is there
> some other new dump request for seahorse that svnmaster gnome org
> hasn't been informed about?

The misunderstanding might be about the so-called "satisfactory way".
For me, placing a module in the same level as "branches, tags, trunk" of
another module is *not* a  satisfactory way, even if the two modules are
related. But this should be probably a svn masters policy.

Claude