Re: Free break request for gnome-clocks

[Kenneth Nielsen <k nielsen81 gmail com>]

I'm not in the i18n approval group, but considering the time in the cycle (now even worse than 3 days ago when the last email was sent), I would recommend only applying it to master after branching, and then to the 3.10 branch after the tar balls for 3.10.0 has been rolled, provided you intend to do a 3.10.1 tar ball for this program. That way we may get the fixed strings into the distributions that use the .1 tar-ball set, but without the risk of releasing untranslated strings for .0. Does that make sense?

Regards Kenneth

2013/9/19 Piotr Drąg <piotrdrag gmail com>

2013/9/19 Daniel Mustieles García <daniel mustieles gmail com>:

> I'd like to commit a patch into gnome-clocks to add some context to two
> strings. Here is the bug, with the patch:
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708214
>
> P. Borelli has reviewed the patch
>

I actually wanted to add these contexts right after branching for
3.10, but I'm ok with adding them now. 1/2 from i18n, but I don't know
if you'll get another +1 this late in the schedule.

--
Piotr Drąg
http://raven.fedorapeople.org/

_______________________________________________
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n