Re: should I upgrade ?
- From: David Ford <david killerlabs com>
- To: Richard Hult <rhult hem2 passagen se>
- cc: philippe enit fr, gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: should I upgrade ?
- Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 12:33:33 -0800 (PST)
On Tue, 9 Mar 1999, Richard Hult wrote:
> I think you are a bit confused ;) First, glibc2 and glibc2.1 are binary
> compatible. Second, gnome is dynamically linked, and will happily use
> the glibc2 that you happen to have. It should work with glibc2.1 as
> well, because of the binary compatibility.
>
> I have the gnome 1.0 rpms installed and most things work, but there are
> a few screwups. I suggest you wait until there are new packages out
> that fixes those problems (some with control-center and maybe some
> more).
Not so. 2.1 breaks a few programs. They show up by either segfaulting or
failing valid crypt() for user authentication or one of a few other ops.
Notably, cucipop, proftpd, and sendmail are likely to exhibit wounds after
going from 2.0 to 2.1.
Simply recompile your apps that break.
-d
--
This is Linux Country. On a quiet night, you can hear Windows NT reboot!
Do you remember how to -think- ? Do you remember how to experiment? Linux
__ is an operating system that brings back the fun and adventure in computing.
\/ for linux-kernel: please read linux/Documentation/* before posting problems
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]