Re: Newbee: Installing Enlightenment
- From: Paul Warren <pdw ferret lmh ox ac uk>
- To: Karl Krasnowsky <karlkras teleport com>
- cc: "gnome-list gnome org" <gnome-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Newbee: Installing Enlightenment
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 11:13:54 +0000 (GMT)
On Tue, 9 Nov 1999, Elliot Lee wrote:
> > Fine. Grabbed the enlightenment 16.2 package as well as all of the
> > dependency packages I could identify, but I still have a few outstanding
> > unsatisfied dependencies that I was hoping someone could help me locate:
> > 1) libm.so.6(GLIB_2.1)
> > 2) libc.so.6(GLIB_2.1)
> > 3) libc.so.6(GLIB_2.0)
> > 4) libdl.so.2(GLIB_2.1)
> > 5) libdl.so.2(GLIB_2.0)
> >
> > The above syntax is the format given to me via the Kpackage utility. Are
> > these items found in one package? Why would it indicate same named files
> > but with two different GLIB references?
>
> (These are symbol version tags.) It wants glibc 2.1.x, and you only have
> 2.0.x installed. I think Caldera 2.3 probably only has glibc 2.0.x.
>
> If you have a GNOME-compatible window manager installed (the list
> currently includes "sawmill enlightenment icewm wmaker") then you should
> be able to ignore the enlightenment dependency in gnome-core. You can
> instead try to find an Enlightenment package for Caldera 2.3 - one may
> come with the distribution, or there might be one on the E site.
Or grab the source RPM from wherever you got that RPM, and do
rpm --rebuild enlightenment.src.rpm
That'll recompile the RPM from sources. Unfortunately, you'll may
find that you are missing a fair few of the devel packages needed to do
that...
Paul
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]