Re: Evolution discussion
- From: "Kevin D. Knerr, Sr." <kknerrsr ptdprolog net>
- To: gnome-list <gnome-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Evolution discussion
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 18:34:04 -0400 (EDT)
On 11 Sep, D-Man wrote:
> I was wondering about the design of evolution. IMHO it is better to have
> separate programs handling the separate responsibilities of e-mail, addresses, and a
> calendar. I would like to know why Evolution is instead following the Microsoft
> example of making a large complicated program that is supposed to do
> everything.
<flamebait>
Actually, it's a case of following the emacs model, except that it's
your mail client rather than your text editor, that does everything ...
</flamebait>
Barthel
--
ld_barthel yahoo com | http://geocities.com/Area51/Shire/4063
Organization: The Pennswald Group -- Linux powered!!
gpg fingerprint: 8D3F 4BFF D36B BFCC FEE5 86A0 2AAF D3DA C395 641E
If you search long enough, you can find a precedent for *anything*.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]