Re: Status of GNOME and OpenOffice?

[Ben Davis <ben xsusio com>]

I just installed 1.1 beta on my gentoo box, and it didn't look quite 
like I had hoped.  The interface is not consistant w/ other Gtk2 apps, 
so I don't think it's Gtk2. Does anyone else know much about this? I'd 
be very happy if OOo became a true Gtk2 app (mostly because it will fit 
my Gtk2 theme :))

Ben Davis

Toralf Lund wrote:

> Now, this one made me rather curious:
>
> rpm -Uvh openoffice-i18n-1.1beta-0pcap.i386.rpm --force
>
> error: failed dependencies:
>     libatk-1.0.so.0   is needed by openoffice-1.1beta-0pcap
>     libfontconfig.so.1   is needed by openoffice-1.1beta-0pcap
>     libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0   is needed by openoffice-1.1beta-0pcap
>     libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0   is needed by openoffice-1.1beta-0pcap
>     libglib-2.0.so.0   is needed by openoffice-1.1beta-0pcap
>     libgmodule-2.0.so.0   is needed by openoffice-1.1beta-0pcap
>     libgobject-2.0.so.0   is needed by openoffice-1.1beta-0pcap
>     libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0   is needed by openoffice-1.1beta-0pcap
>     libpango-1.0.so.0   is needed by openoffice-1.1beta-0pcap
>     libpangox-1.0.so.0   is needed by openoffice-1.1beta-0pcap
>     libpangoxft-1.0.so.0   is needed by openoffice-1.1beta-0pcap
>     libXft.so.2   is needed by openoffice-1.1beta-0pcap
>
> ... where openoffice-i18n-1.1beta-0pcap.i386.rpm is built by me, 
> mostly by combining Red Hat's OOo 1.0.2 pacakge with the 
> OpenOffice.org "Linux precompiled" distribution of 1.1 beta.
>
> OK, so I didn't have Gtk 2 on this particular host, but apart from 
> that: This must mean that parts of OOo actually use Gtk now! Which 
> ones, exactly? Does this mean that OOo is about to get *properly* 
> integrated with GNOME?