[gnome-love] Xaw
- From: "mike flyn org" <mike flyn org>
- To: <gnome-love gnome org>
- Subject: [gnome-love] Xaw
- Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 08:01:39 -0400
I've been using various X Athena-based applications for years, However...
Call me crazy, but a modern, user-friendly desktop should not contain
applications built with the X Athena widget library. I think most people
would feel it is ugly and difficult to use. However, most packaging
systems out there strongly recommend installing Xaw applications.
For example, Debian's xbase-clients contains several Xaw applications.
Of these applications, I would like to start a discussion about which
are no longer needed, which have GNOME replacements and which need
replacements written. If I get some agreement about Xaw and some input, I
would like to petition various package managers to make their packages
a bit more fine grained. For example, xbase-client could become
xbase-client and xbase-client-xaw.
I started with a list of Xaw applications that I have on my system:
Package xbase-client:
Xaw App. GNOME App.
==========================
beforelight xscreensaver
bitmap gimp?
editres ?
listres ?
viewres ?
xbiff gbiff
xcalc GNOME's calculator
xclipboard ?
xclock various GNOME clocks
xconsole ?
xcutsel not needed?
xditview not needed?
xedit gedit
xf86cfg xf86config, distribution-provided tools
xfd ?
xfontsel GNOME applications should display fonts in menus
xgamma Why does this require Xaw?
xgc GNOME IDEs?
xkbbell ?
xkbvleds ?
xkbwatch ?
xload gtop, various panel applets
xlogo ?
xmag GNOME
xman yelp
xmessage gdialog
xsm gnome-session
xvidtune ?
Package tetex-bin:
Xaw App. GNOME App.
==========================
xdvi.real xgdvi (NEEDS TO BE PORTED TO gtk2.0?
oxdvi.real xgdvi should GNOME have one electronic
document viewer for pdf, ps, dvi, etc?)
Package gv:
Xaw3d App. GNOME App.
==========================
gv gpdf (no problem to replace but see xgdvi note)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]