On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 23:04 -0400, Bryan Clark wrote: > On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 12:03 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > > The general thought seemed to be that we should create a new CVS module. > > I half-jokingly suggested calling it gup, for Grand Unified Printing, > > but people seemed to like it. However the gup is also the abbreviation > > for the GNOME Usability Project, but they don't have a CVS module. Do > > we care about this? > > I think the real question is 'do you care about usability?' ;-) And I > guess a secondary question is 'Is the Usability Team going to use the > gup module for anything?' The answer to that one is most likely a no, > we have space under the /gnome.org/projects area and I can't imagine us > needing more. The question is, are we so impoverished for names we need to reuse this one? Is 'gup' really a good name for a printing module? Shouldn't we use something mildly descriptive like gnome-printing-tools, gnome-print-utils, etc? Regards, Owen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part