Re: Grand Unified Printing

[Colin Walters <walters redhat com>]

On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 16:37 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:

> The question is, are we so impoverished for names we need to reuse this
> one? Is 'gup' really a good name for a printing module? Shouldn't we
> use something mildly descriptive like gnome-printing-tools,
> gnome-print-utils, etc?

I don't actually care about the name; either of those are fine.  I'm
more wondering about the unification plan...