On Mo, 2008-06-09 at 12:30 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 13:24 +0200, daniel g. siegel wrote: > > hey! > > > > of course you are right about the fact, that then every app could put > > itself onto the gtkfilechooser. > > > > but i would like to see it more like: every hardware device is putting > > itself up there. i mean, you can access your disks, your favourite > > places, why not your webcam? > > We're browsing for files, otherwise we could add every single piece of > hardware in there. Should we add a way to create sound samples from > within the file chooser because people might need to upload them? What > about creating screencasts from within the filechooser? Maybe a drawing, > because I can draw with my tablet... why not? ;) i mean, if you often draw with your tablet, you could find that very useful. of course then we would need a proper preference dialog, where you can choose what to see and what not > > You could add a "Capture new avatar" under the cheese tagged images in > Cosimo's work, I don't deny that, but adding it as a top-level sidebar > item is just overdoing it. > > > of course we should do that with a common sense and not putting it up > > there, when a user looks for his ice cream. > > How would you know what the user is looking for? > -- this mail was sent using 100% recycled electrons ================================================ daniel g. siegel <dgsiegel gmail com> http://home.cs.tum.edu/~siegel gnupg key id: 0x6EEC9E62 fingerprint: DE5B 1F64 9034 1FB6 E120 DE10 268D AFD5 6EEC 9E62 encrypted email preferred
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part