Re: gnome_vfs_next_address() poorly named

[Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch gmx de>]

On Sat, 2004-07-17 at 16:08, Murray Cumming wrote:

> The gnome-vfs-resolve.h functions would be more consistent if
> gnome_vfs_next_address() was renamed to gnome_vfs_resolve_next_address
> ().

Actually, the docs for gnome_vfs_resolve talk about

  gnome_vfs_resolve_next_address

so I wonder whether

  gnome_vfs_next_address

was just a mistake and should be changed before the hard API freeze
arrives?

Bye,
-Torsten