Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] ILS extension on ils.seconix.com

[PUYDT Julien <julien puydt laposte net>]

Le ven 03/01/2003 à 15:51, Damien Sandras a écrit :
> Le ven 03/01/2003 à 15:39, PUYDT Julien a écrit :
> 
> > This means I can't know a friend is online if I don't try to call
> > him/her?
> 
> No, in the different groups, there would be a Refresh button, and it
> would permit to show if your friends are online or not.

You mean gm will search all members on the group on the server, to know
if they're here!?

> > I don't like it...
> You never like new ideas.

Tsssttt...

> > > If you think it is a good idea, we could use the ilsa39321630 attribute
> > > proposed by Microsoft but unused by Netmeeting :
> > 
> > Unused by nm? Why did they propose that attribute then? 
> > 
> 
> mailto://bill gates microsoft com ;)

I'm sure you meant callto://... ;-)

> > I really don't like your idea.
> > 
> > I want to be able to killfile someone that has the habit to call every
> > name on the server; has nothing to say; has sex-oriented things to say;
> > or a combination of all, but still be callable by friends, or unknown
> > people just trying to do some tests...
> 
> My idea doesn't mean that filters wouldn't be implemented. It is just a
> way to be joignable without being published on ILS. To be honest, I
> don't really like to be online on ILS with my name published, that is
> why I'm in Do Not Disturb mode. But what is the point in registering and
> being in Do Not Disturb?

I register in DND to show gm is being used!

> Many users don't register to ILS and mail the IP or use another mean of
> communication just because they don't want to be published to everybody.
> That is the proof that ILS is not a good communication medium in its
> current state.

That is true.

Snark