Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] [Fwd: Re: URL bugs?]
- From: Damien Sandras <dsandras seconix com>
- To: gnomemeeting-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] [Fwd: Re: URL bugs?]
- Date: 02 Jun 2003 10:39:15 +0200
Hi Christian,
It is indeed counter-intuitive... Imagine that to call
mymachine.com:1740, you have to write :
- callto:mymachine.com:1740
- OR h323:@mymachine.com:1740
The @ is the counter-intuitive part, no?
I'm not sure most of our users will be able to understand that :(
But I agree conforming to a RFC is better...
Le lun 02/06/2003 à 10:27, Christian Strauf a écrit :
> Hi Damien!
>
> > Are we going back to callto: as default instead of h323: ?
> >
> > There is an RFC about h323:, but it looks indeed counter-intuitive...
> I would stick with the RFC because I tend to agree with Miguel's arguments.
> This URL's definition has to be precise. Apart from that I really can't see why
> the h323-URL definition is counter intuitive -- it's quite clear what to put in
> which place. And to be honest: addressing a snail mail letter is more difficult
> than using the h323-URL -- you need to write the name, the street, the
> apartment-#, the postcode, the city and the national code onto a letter; and
> all in the right order, and twice, the recipient and the source! Giving 3 or 4
> examples in the documentation should be completely sufficient to understand,
> how to use the h323:-notation.
>
> Just my 2-¤-Cents.
> Christian
--
_ Damien Sandras
(o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/
//\ FOSDEM 2003: http://www.fosdem.org
v_/_ H.323 phone: callto://ils.seconix.com/dsandras seconix com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]