Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] [Fwd: Re: URL bugs?]
- From: Miguel Rodríguez <Miguel Rodriguez det uvigo es>
- To: gnomemeeting-devel-list gnome org
- Cc: Damien Sandras <dsandras seconix com>
- Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] [Fwd: Re: URL bugs?]
- Date: 02 Jun 2003 10:40:51 +0200
El lun, 02-06-2003 a las 10:27, Christian Strauf escribió:
> Hi Damien!
>
> > Are we going back to callto: as default instead of h323: ?
> >
> > There is an RFC about h323:, but it looks indeed counter-intuitive...
> I would stick with the RFC because I tend to agree with Miguel's arguments.
> This URL's definition has to be precise. Apart from that I really can't see why
> the h323-URL definition is counter intuitive -- it's quite clear what to put in
> which place. And to be honest: addressing a snail mail letter is more difficult
> than using the h323-URL -- you need to write the name, the street, the
> apartment-#, the postcode, the city and the national code onto a letter; and
> all in the right order, and twice, the recipient and the source! Giving 3 or 4
> examples in the documentation should be completely sufficient to understand,
> how to use the h323:-notation.
99% agree. Although examples in the documentation can be helpful, I
still think writing urls by hand is a kind of "very advanced usage". In
my opinion GM should write this urls for you 95% of the time, so most
users wouldn't need to bother about this.
BTW, a useful feature would be a kind of signature generator or
something like that, that based on your registration settings would
generate a valid h323 url for you.
>
> Just my 2-€-Cents.
> Christian
Le lun 02/06/2003 à 10:24, GnomeMeeting master a écrit :
> Well, I agree with you, but I don't understand if you answered to my
> question or not...
Well, Christian managed to express myself (wow, what a sentence) much better than i did ;).
> PS: no coffee here yet either ;)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]