Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] Transparent proxies

[Damien Sandras <dsandras seconix com>]

Probably easier to run Apache on a different port on seconix.com, what
do you think?


Le sam 24/01/2004 à 13:38, Miguel Rodríguez Pérez a écrit :
> I put a little script at http://www-gris.det.uvigo.es/~miguel/tmp/ that
> returns:
> ip1: if it exists, the value of HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR
> ip2: if it exists, the value of HTTP_CLIENT_IP
> ip3: if it exists, the value of REMOTE_ADDR
> 
> TheBonsai got an invaled value for ip1 (127.0.0.1), no value for ip2 and
> a correct one for ip3.
> manty got two values for ip1 (he sees to transparent proxies), a correct
> one for ip2 and the proxy address for ip3.
> I get correct values for both ip1 and ip2, and the proxy address for
> ip3.
> 
> I suggest looking for ip2 and using it if that exists. If it doesn't
> just trust ip3.
> In any case, as an additional measure, use tcp connection address for
> reouting udp traffic, and just use the cgi ip for the ils directory.
> 
> A more elaborate proposal comes from manty:
> " check the IPs (as there may be many) in IP1 and get only those that
> are public, I mean, filter those that are private out of there." Then
> choose the first public one. If there are none, check ip2, and finally
> ip3.
> 
> Comments?
-- 
 _      Damien Sandras
(o-     
//\     It-Optics s.a.
v_/_    GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/
        FOSDEM 2004:  http://www.fosdem.org
        H.323 phone:  callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras seconix com