[GnomeMeeting-devel-list] Re: Transparent proxies
- From: Santiago Garcia Mantinan <manty manty net>
- To: Miguel =?iso-8859-15?q?Rodr=EDguez_P=E9rez?= <migrax terra es>
- Cc: Damien Sandras <dsandras seconix com>, gnomemeeting-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] Re: Transparent proxies
- Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 13:56:33 +0100
> manty got two values for ip1 (he sees to transparent proxies), a correct
> one for ip2 and the proxy address for ip3.
Miguel wanted to say that I see *two* transparent proxies, that means that
my petitions go through two transparent proxies, one is mine and the other
one from the ISP.
The reson why I told Miguel to do all those checks is because my transparent
proxy, a squid, desn't set HTTP_CLIENT_IP, so I suppose you can find a lot
for which you don't get IP2, in fact I think that HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR is
the standard thing to check for.
The algorithm can be implemented in a lot of ways, but I think that both
CLIENT_IP and X_FORWARDED_FOR should be taken into account.
Regards...
--
Manty/BestiaTester -> http://manty.net
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]