Le jeudi 30 septembre 2004 à 23:17 +0200, Damien Sandras a écrit : > Le jeudi 30 septembre 2004 à 20:28 +0200, daniel huhardeaux a écrit : > > How many of GM users are running behing such kind of devices? I guess > > that most of them will *not* be part of them so perhaps you could > > propose auto-configure as default. If I'm wrong forgive my intrusion ;-) > > > > I have no idea really... > I guess most routers are not H323-capable. Other opinions? Another reason why I have not autoconfigured things is that it is not enough to enable IP translation. It is enough to enable STUN support in non-symmetric NAT (too rare), but not enough to enable IP Translation. There is also additional configuration required, as mentionned in the FAQ. If I autoconfigure things, perhaps the user would think it is enough and wonder why it doesn't work. So I force him to do it himself so that he understands it is not enough and reads the FAQ. my 2 cents :) -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras seconix com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=