Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] NAT traversal / [RFC] secondary STUN server option

From: Jan Schampera <jan schampera web de>
To: GnomeMeeting development mailing list <gnomemeeting-devel-list gnome org>
Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] NAT traversal / [RFC] secondary STUN server option
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 16:43:48 +0100

On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 16:38:29 +0100
Julien PUYDT <jpuydt free fr> wrote:

> > so lets bring a "Secondary STUN Server" option in prefs.
> 
> And a third, and a fourth, and... in case something bad happens :-/
Do you set 10 DNS servers for your OS, in case 9 fail?
I set 2, in case 1 fails.

Similar should be possible here, IMHO.

J.

-- 
dreaming in digital
living in realtime
thinking in binary
talking in IP

WELCOME TO OUR WORLD

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] NAT traversal / [RFC] secondary STUN server option
  - From: Julien PUYDT
- Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] NAT traversal / [RFC] secondary STUN server option
  - From: Damien Sandras

References:
- [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] NAT traversal problem
  - From: Julien PUYDT
- Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] NAT traversal problem
  - From: thomas schorpp
- Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] NAT traversal problem
  - From: Kilian Krause
- Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] NAT traversal / [RFC] secondary STUN server option
  - From: thomas schorpp
- Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] NAT traversal / [RFC] secondary STUN server option
  - From: Julien PUYDT

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]