Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] NAT traversal / [RFC] secondary STUN server option

[Damien Sandras <dsandras seconix com>]

Le dimanche 29 janvier 2006 à 16:43 +0100, Jan Schampera a écrit :
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 16:38:29 +0100
> Julien PUYDT <jpuydt free fr> wrote:
> 
> > > so lets bring a "Secondary STUN Server" option in prefs.
> > 
> > And a third, and a fourth, and... in case something bad happens :-/
> Do you set 10 DNS servers for your OS, in case 9 fail?
> I set 2, in case 1 fails.
> 
> Similar should be possible here, IMHO.
> 

Another pref is out of the question.

A DNS Round Robin might be a solution, but I don't see know it could
detect that one is out of service.


-- 
 _      Damien Sandras
(o-     
//\     GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/
v_/_    FOSDEM 2006 : http://www.fosdem.org
        SIP Phone   : sip:dsandras gnomemeeting net 
                      sip:600000 gnomemeeting net