RE: Glib main loop update





-----Original Message-----
From:	Jeff Garzik [SMTP:jgarzik@pobox.com]
Sent:	1998 m. Lapkritis 23 d. 17:29
To:	gtk-devel-list@redhat.com
Subject:	Re: Glib main loop update

Owen Taylor wrote:
> [ On a different subject, what do people think about splitting
>   up glib.h, which is 2200 lines before these main loop
>   additions? ]

Yes!  /usr/include/glib/*.h would be great.

The GTK+ headers are very easy to read, and my on-line GTK+ reference
consists of "cd /usr/include/gtk ; less <file>.h".  It would be great if
GLib were organized along those same lines.

	Jeff


[Martynas Kunigelis]  I second that. How the header should be split up is 
not a trivial question, though. For GLib objects like linked lists or hash 
tables, the choice is obvious (<glib/glist.h>, <glib/ghashtable.h> etc.), 
but the basic things like the types (guint32 and friends) and endian 
conversion macros need some thought IMHO. <glib/gtypes.h> and 
<glib/gendian.h> probably are good choices. Where the simple utility 
functions like g_basename() or g_dirname() belong, I have no idea. Maybe 
<glib/gutil.h> ?

Please excuse me if this message seems malformed or such, I'm using MS 
Outlook to send it :( Company policy, you know.

-Martynas
--
         To unsubscribe: mail gtk-devel-list-request@redhat.com with
                       "unsubscribe" as the Subject.



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]