Re: PATCH: Re: Gtk-CRITICAL error
- From: "Sergio A. Kessler" <ser perio unlp edu ar>
- To: gtk-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: PATCH: Re: Gtk-CRITICAL error
- Date: Sun, 01 Aug 1999 23:25:36 -0300
Soeren Sandmann wrote:
>
> Soeren Sandmann <sandmann@daimi.au.dk> writes:
>
> > "Iain" <nodatadj@webtribe.net> writes:
> >
> > > Here's a patch for gmessages.c in GLIB so that it will print out the program
> > > name everytime it prints a warning. I find it annoying whenever I return to
> >
> > Your patch makes testglib and and any other program that does not
> > use g_set_prgname crash.
maybe fixing this programs will also be good ...
> > I think it should be written like this:
>
> Duh.
>
> Like this:
why you don't do just only one 'if' like:
if (!prgname) then prgname = 'unknown' (you get the idea, no?)
> --- /users/sandmann/extra/src/glib/gmessages.c Sun Aug 1 19:55:31 1999
> +++ gmessages.c Sun Aug 1 20:35:58 1999
> @@ -423,10 +423,12 @@
> GErrorFunc local_glib_error_func;
> GWarningFunc local_glib_warning_func;
> GPrintFunc local_glib_message_func;
> + gchar *prgname;
>
> in_recursion = (log_level & G_LOG_FLAG_RECURSION) != 0;
> is_fatal = (log_level & G_LOG_FLAG_FATAL) != 0;
> log_level &= G_LOG_LEVEL_MASK;
> + prgname = g_get_prgname ();
>
> if (!message)
> message = "g_log_default_handler(): (NULL) message";
> @@ -457,14 +459,19 @@
> }
> /* use write(2) for output, in case we are out of memeory */
> ensure_stdout_valid ();
> + write (fd, "\n", 1);
> + if (prgname)
> + {
> + write (fd, prgname, strlen (prgname));
> + write (fd, ": ", 2);
> + }
> if (log_domain)
> {
> - write (fd, "\n", 1);
> write (fd, log_domain, strlen (log_domain));
> write (fd, "-", 1);
> }
> else
> - write (fd, "\n** ", 4);
> + write (fd, "** ", 3);
> if (in_recursion)
> write (fd, "ERROR (recursed) **: ", 21);
> else
> @@ -477,14 +484,19 @@
> break;
> case G_LOG_LEVEL_CRITICAL:
> ensure_stdout_valid ();
> + write (fd, "\n", 1);
> + if (prgname)
> + {
> + write (fd, prgname, strlen (prgname));
> + write (fd, ": ", 2);
> + }
> if (log_domain)
> {
> - write (fd, "\n", 1);
> write (fd, log_domain, strlen (log_domain));
> write (fd, "-", 1);
> }
> else
> - write (fd, "\n** ", 4);
> + write (fd, "** ", 3);
> if (in_recursion)
> write (fd, "CRITICAL (recursed) **: ", 24);
> else
> @@ -503,14 +515,19 @@
> return;
> }
> ensure_stdout_valid ();
> + write (fd, "\n", 1);
> + if (prgname)
> + {
> + write (fd, prgname, strlen (prgname));
> + write (fd, ": ", 2);
> + }
> if (log_domain)
> {
> - write (fd, "\n", 1);
> write (fd, log_domain, strlen (log_domain));
> write (fd, "-", 1);
> }
> else
> - write (fd, "\n** ", 4);
> + write (fd, "** ", 3);
> if (in_recursion)
> write (fd, "WARNING (recursed) **: ", 23);
> else
> @@ -529,6 +546,11 @@
> return;
> }
> ensure_stdout_valid ();
> + if (prgname)
> + {
> + write (fd, prgname, strlen (prgname));
> + write (fd, ": ", 2);
> + }
> if (log_domain)
> {
> write (fd, log_domain, strlen (log_domain));
> @@ -546,6 +568,11 @@
> break;
> case G_LOG_LEVEL_INFO:
> ensure_stdout_valid ();
> + if (prgname)
> + {
> + write (fd, prgname, strlen (prgname));
> + write (fd, ": ", 2);
> + }
> if (log_domain)
> {
> write (fd, log_domain, strlen (log_domain));
> @@ -563,6 +590,11 @@
> break;
> case G_LOG_LEVEL_DEBUG:
> ensure_stdout_valid ();
> + if (prgname)
> + {
> + write (fd, prgname, strlen (prgname));
> + write (fd, ": ", 2);
> + }
> if (log_domain)
> {
> write (fd, log_domain, strlen (log_domain));
> @@ -583,6 +615,11 @@
> * try to make the best out of it.
> */
> ensure_stdout_valid ();
> + if (prgname)
> + {
> + write (fd, prgname, strlen (prgname));
> + write (fd, ": ", 2);
> + }
> if (log_domain)
> {
> write (fd, log_domain, strlen (log_domain));
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail gtk-devel-list-request@redhat.com with
> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
--
| Sergio A. Kessler http://sak.org.ar
-O_O- You can have it Soon, Cheap, and Working; choose *two*.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]