Re: Restructuring GDK for 1.3

[Tim Janik <timj gtk org>]

On 30 Aug 1999, Owen Taylor wrote:

> 
> Raja R Harinath <harinath@cs.umn.edu> writes:
> 
> > Owen Taylor <otaylor@redhat.com> writes:
> > > includes win32/gdkwindow.i or x11/gdkwindow.i as appropriate. 
> > > (The .i suffix I think is clearer than using .c or .h).
> > 
> > The .i suffix already has a meaning of C source passed through cpp.
> > Let's not confuse that usage with this.
> > 
> > One suggestion is to use `.cP' extension (it is used in `gnome-libs'
> > for one function).  
> 
> Hmmm, .cP to me looks like it should be related to .cpp;
> which it isn't at all.
> 
> If nobody objects, I'll use '.cI', which seems to be unused
> as far as I can tell.

hm, why .cI and not .ci? suddenly starting out with uppercase letters
in our source file name extensions strikes me as odd.


> 
> Regards,
>                                         Owen
> 
> 

---
ciaoTJ