Re: New 'GObject' as base for GtkObject?

[Eric Lemings <eric b lemings lmco com>]

David Benson wrote:
> 
> - on GObject.  Too complex for glib, IMO.  It would require
>   moving the signal stuff too, and the signal marshallers (which seem
>   rather unseemly for glib anyway).
> 
>   More likely successful with be investigating how to compile the right
>   subset gtk so as not to require X, as my sound program
>   also could benefit.
> 

That would be a good solution: make another subset of GTK+ like GDK.

Maybe GOTS (GTK+ Object Type System)?

Eric.