Re: Proposal: g_set_out_of_mem_handler

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Hi,

I agree that we should go for the out of mem handler because:

 - it will use only a few bytes; one global function pointer, one 
   function to set that pointer, one default handler that calls abort()
 - it will make lots of people feel better, and who knows, may genuinely 
   be useful in some cases

Havoc