Re: gerror.c revisited
- From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- To: <dom recoil org>
- Cc: Darin Adler <darin eazel com>, <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: gerror.c revisited
- Date: 31 Aug 2000 13:39:59 -0400
<dom@recoil.org> writes:
> I disagree. Runtime errors should be handled (and there's no excuse for not
> handling them with the GError methods). If it is a program ending problem,
> a dialog should appear instead of a message to stderr.
>
Remember that GLib is used in nongraphical apps. (Even with graphical
apps, some failures such as "can't connect to display" can't go to a
dialog.)
But yes, in general GError is intended to increase the number of error
dialogs in GTK+ applications. For example, its use in gexec.h should
mean that panel launchers won't silently fail.
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]