Re: Missing implementations of function prototypes.

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

"Sam O'Connor" <oconnor@eiffel.com> writes: 
> We would like
> out customers to be able to type make, have the wrapper
> library built along with the application that uses it,
> and not have to change it by hand to remove the undefined
> functions.
> 

Your wrapper-generator should be able to trivially special-case these
functions, I hope this isn't more than a few lines of code, so
hopefully it doesn't actually matter for your customers.

Most likely a patch to clean it up would be accepted of course.

Havoc