Re: [OT] Re: Third draft (was Re: defs files)
- From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- To: gtk-devel-list redhat com
- Cc: kenelson sequoia ece ucdavis edu
- Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Third draft (was Re: defs files)
- Date: 21 Jan 2000 16:54:30 -0500
Karl Nelson <kenelson@ece.ucdavis.edu> writes:
> I am not sure I would call gtk-- a lot of manual code. It is
> only 4.5k manual lines with 15k auto generated lines. Not bad
> for a library wrapping every function with type conversions and
> deriving every gtk+ class. Considering we are wrapping a library
> with 127k lines that is only 4%. :-)
>
Guillaume is always complaining about how much work it is. ;-)
> There are a lot better choices for thick wrappers. wxGTK
> 25K gtk lines (128k total!), or Vdk with 13k lines.
>
...
>
> I think there are a lot more languages are statically compiled
> like Pascal and Fortran. No need to single C++ out. ;-)
>
I'm just not familiar with any of those wrappers, I only know anything
about the Python, Scheme, and Gtk-- bindings. :-)
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]