Re: CTree question
- From: "Buzz Megg" <buzmeg hotmail com>
- To: hp redhat com, buzmeg hotmail com
- Cc: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: CTree question
- Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2000 14:25:44 EDT
Okaaaay, CTree sucks. Rewrite it.
Snide comment aside, I have a finite amount of programming time. This
sounds like I'm going to spend a lot of time working around CTree that would
be better off spent working *on* CTree.
CTree kinda sucked two? years ago when I first used it as part of gtk, and
it still seems to suck now. Why? Is it lack of time? Is it deprecated and
everybody else uses something else (if so, what?)?
Is it a widget that should just be killed? Does everyone else just
specialize CList? Why is there still no documentation on it? Help me
understand this and maybe I can help rectify it.
This issue came up in C++ only because STL containers want default
constructors. Default constructors imply being able to modify the widget
after it is already formed. This *can* be worked around, it's just
annoying.
I don't know Python well enough to comment.
-a
Havoc Pennington wrote:
>CTree sucks, work around it. I don't see how the problem is unique to
>C++ though, or why C++ in particular requires this functionality more
>than C or Python.
>
>Havoc
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]