Re: glib memory checking
- From: Tim Janik <timj gtk org>
- To: Michael Meeks <mmeeks gnu org>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: glib memory checking
- Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 08:13:12 +0200 (CEST)
On Sat, 15 Jul 2000, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 15 Jul 2000, Tim Janik wrote:
> > as a userbase for the profiling and debugging code is provably in
> existance
>
> Indeed =)
>
> > and for all (and still enables debugging/profiling variants for those
> > that can't use dmalloc or memprof etc. tools for whatever reasons).
>
> Well; I had a look at fitting memory stamping for free'd memory
> into memprof; the problem is that the size data for the block is stored in
> the central process at the other end of a unidirectional buffered pipe
> IIRC. So, the option of making that bidirectional and blocking on read
> each time we do a free was not attractive. Consequently memprof can't do
> what g_free can do. Furthermore I know nothing about dmalloc; is it free
> software ? if so is there a URL ?
yes, investigated it a bit about a year ago, i don't know where it went
since ;)
a quick grep in /usr/share/doc/dmalloc (i've got it installed as a debian
package) reveals:
copyright:The author may be contacted via http://www.dmalloc.com/
> > similar to the current G_DISABLE_ASSERT, there will probably also be a
> > G_ENABLE_MEMSAVE define, settable through a configure.in option, that
> > can disable the caching behaviour for those portions that people dare
> > patching.
>
> Excellent, but for now can we switch to 0x2e =)
we'll be there soon enough with the vtable approach ;)
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael.
>
---
ciaoTJ
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]