Re: ControlMask

["David Reid" <dreid jetnet co uk>]

The problem with the bleeding edge version is that it needs Pango and we've
only just started looking at that!  We've spent most of the weekend looking
at getting the thread support in GLib up to scratch (it's 99% of the way
there).  Hopefully I'll post some diffs when I get a moment.  I'd like to do
more on GIOChannel but without a test program it makes testing/bug finding
very difficult.  Is there such a beast somewhere?

I only got involved in porting GTK about 2 weeks ago and a small group of us
(normally 2 but 3 at times) have managed to come a long way in those 2
weeks.

Next on the agenda is to look at Pango as this is required for the newest
GTK, no?

Thankfully the required libraries for Pango built almost out the box so we
have them done.  Now just the hard bit.  I've already "spoken" with Owen and
he's pointed me in the right direction so it's just a question of time...

david

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tor Lillqvist" <tml@iki.fi>
To: "Daniel" <dsrogers@uclink4.berkeley.edu>
Cc: <gtk-devel-list@gnome.org>
Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2000 11:12 PM
Subject: ControlMask


> Daniel writes:
>  > I am trying to get The GIMP running on BeOS and it is using a global
>  > called ControlMask in four places.
>
> That must be GIMP 1.0.something? I think you really should try to get
> the developer version (1.1.24 currently) running instead. It has had
> many portability problems like this sorted out a long time ago when
> being ported to Win32 and OS/2. Not to mention that it has *lots* of
> interesting new stuff not present in 1.0.something.
>
> --tml
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-devel-list mailing list
> gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
>