Re: clist preformance



On Wed, 08 Mar 2000, Ralf Forsberg wrote:
>Hello,
>
>The following program give g_list_nth() quite a
>workout , it uses 99.95% cpu time for me and
>finishes in just under one minute (pentium233).
>
>It is faster if I set the text directly when adding
>the rows, but I don't want to do that.

I think using a hash table instead ot the linear
list would help a lot. I could make a patch if
wanted; it would (I think) mostly be a 
search-and-replace operation.

Or am I abusing the clist with 20000 rows?

 / Ralf



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]