Re: glib outstanding stuff
- From: George <jirka 5z com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: George <jirka 5z com>, Tim Janik <timj gtk org>, Gtk+ Developers <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: glib outstanding stuff
- Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 17:20:52 -0700
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 04:09:19PM -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> They don't have different semantics that I see. I changed around my
> enum values so that the GFileTest enum in glib happens to have the
> same values as the anonymous enum in libgnome, so we can remove the
> g_file_test() function from libgnome but leave in the anonymous enum
> (suitably deprecated).
>
> I couldn't come up with any name other than g_file_test() I was happy
> with...
>
> Anyway, checked in as g_file_test() for now.
Good, in this case I'd actually say that keeping the name is better since
it's an already documented function that people may know.
George
--
George <jirka 5z com>
Men willingly believe what they wish.
-- Julius Caesar
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]