Re: ref counting

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Tim Janik <timj gtk org> writes:
> 
> is that our standard reply to bug indications now?
> joshua has been playing with/looking at/sent in patches for devel CVS
> for quite some time already, and he's right in pointing out that we
> have major object reference leaks in gtk. there're lots of bugs in
> current CVS and we need every helping hand out there.

That is why I said:

> Havoc wrote:
> > We appreciate the bug reports, please keep filing them (preferably on
> > bugzilla.gnome.org so they don't get lost). But you are not using a
> > released/stable version of GTK.

He seemed to be confused about the stability of current code though,
so I wanted to make sure he wasn't getting a bad impression of GTK by
thinking we considered CVS HEAD a stable product.

Havoc