Re: ref counting

[Joshua N Pritikin <vishnu pobox com>]

On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 05:43:07PM -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Tim Janik <timj gtk org> writes:
> > is that our standard reply to bug indications now?
> > joshua has been playing with/looking at/sent in patches for devel CVS
> > for quite some time already, and he's right in pointing out that we
> > have major object reference leaks in gtk. there're lots of bugs in
> > current CVS and we need every helping hand out there.
> 
> That is why I said:
> 
> > Havoc wrote:
> > > We appreciate the bug reports, please keep filing them (preferably on
> > > bugzilla.gnome.org so they don't get lost). But you are not using a
> > > released/stable version of GTK.
> 
> He seemed to be confused about the stability of current code though,
> so I wanted to make sure he wasn't getting a bad impression of GTK by
> thinking we considered CVS HEAD a stable product.

Folks . . . relax!!

Gtk 2.0 is looking to be an awesome product.  Can you blame me if i get
a little overexcited sometimes?

-- 
Get self-realization at <http://sahajayoga.org> ... <http://why-compete.org> ?
  Victory to the Divine Mother!!