Re: pnm loader fixes and tests



Is anyone backporting these fixes to the stable branch where they are
still absolutely critical?

--Larry

On Tue, 2001-08-28 at 11:43, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> 
> "Matthias Clasen" <matthiasc poet de> writes: 
> > Yes, these random tests are pretty good. 
> > 
> > TEST_RANDOM ('P', 150, FALSE);
> > 
> > allowed me to catch one more buffer overrun in the pnm loader.
> > 
> 
> Ideally, each time we found a random image that broke things, we could
> save it for regression testing... I meant to add that feature to the
> test app but never got around to it.
> 
> Havoc





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]