Re: Patch for definition of NULL

From: Kaz Kylheku <kaz ashi footprints net>
To: Mark Murnane <Mark Murnane Sun COM>
Cc: Darin Adler <darin bentspoon com>, <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
Subject: Re: Patch for definition of NULL
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 11:17:55 -0700 (PDT)

On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Mark Murnane wrote:

> The reason for using 0L is that in a 64-bit environment, you need a
> 64-bit NULL.

I don't, personally. :) I'm extra careful to do the right things when
variable argument lists are involved.

References:
- Re: Patch for definition of NULL
  - From: Mark Murnane

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]