Re: GIOChannel diff committed
- From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- To: Hans Breuer <hans breuer org>
- Cc: Ron Steinke <rsteinke w-link net>, gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GIOChannel diff committed
- Date: 21 Jul 2001 11:20:47 -0400
Hans Breuer <hans breuer org> writes:
> At 13:22 20.07.01 -0700, Ron Steinke wrote:
> > I've committed the big GIOChannel diff I had. This goes a long
> >way towards getting the new GIOChannel API working. Additionally,
> >with any luck, the win32 implementation should now compile
> >(win32 developers, please confirm). I'm eagerly awaiting the bug reports.
> >
> I've just commited a first implementation. iochannel-test runs, at least once:
> D:\devel\my-gtk\glib\tests>iochannel-test
>
> (process:4294812219): ** WARNING **: Channel set flags unsupported
> BLOCKING TRUE
>
> : Line one
>
> : Line two
>
> : Line three
>
> : /* Hello */
>
> : \x1234\x567890\x6666
>
> read 62 bytes, wrote 62 bytes
>
> The second time it stumbles over it own output, because there is a
> read-only version of 'iochannel-test-outfile' still around. Is this a cross
> platform feature?
>
> D:\devel\my-gtk\glib\tests>iochannel-test
>
> (process:4294721143): ** WARNING **: Permission denied
>
> (process:4294721143): ** WARNING **: Unable to open file
> iochannel-test-outfile
gio_w = g_io_channel_new_file( "iochannel-test-outfile", "w", &gerr);
/**
* g_io_channel_new_file:
* @filename: A string containing the name of a file.
* @mode: One of "r", "w", "a", "r+", "w+", "a+". These have
* the same meaning as in fopen().
* @error: A location to return an error of type %G_IO_FILE_ERROR.
*
`w'
Open the file for writing only. If the file already exists,
it is truncated to zero length. Otherwise a new file is
created.
(This is the GNU libc definition, but I'm sure it corresponds
to the ISO standard)
So, probably some fix is needed in your g_io_channel_new_file()...
since the code looks like the Unix version, it may be that
the Win32 implementation of open() is buggy in its handling
of
flags = O_WRONLY | O_TRUNC | O_CREAT;
But I"m not really in a position to suggestion an alternate way
of doing things or a workaround.
Regards,
Owen
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]