Re: Gdk-WARNING **: window 0x520 unexpectedly destroyed
- From: Hans Breuer <hans breuer org>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Gdk-WARNING **: window 0x520 unexpectedly destroyed
- Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 18:28:21 +0200
At 10:50 21.07.01 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
>
>Hans Breuer <hans breuer org> writes:
>
>> Hi Owen,
>> recent cvs gtk (win32) gives me a bunch of 'unexpectedly destroyed'
>> warnings (apparently for almost every window). They vanish, if I
>> revert your change:
>>
>> Mon Jul 2 16:53:25 2001 Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
>>
>> * gdk/gdkwindow.c (_gdk_window_destroy_hierarchy): Don't
>> mark the window as destroyed until after we
>> called _gdk_windowing_window_destroy().
>> (_gdk_windowing_window_destroy() may use GDK functions
>> on the window.)
>>
>> ... which probably isn't the right sollution :)
>> Do you have any hints how this issues should be resolved correctly ?
>
>Where is gdk_window_destroy_notify() being called from?
>
>As far as I can see, you should only get it when you get a WM_DESTROY
>message in gdk_event_translate(),
Right.
>and gdk_event_translate shouldn't
>get called out of _gdk_window_destroy_hierarchy(),
_gdk_window_destroy_hierarchy calls
_gdk_windowing_window_destroy which calls
DestroyWindow which sends the WM_DESTROY message to the window
which gets handled by the window procedure calling finally calling
gdk_event_translate.
The window procedure gets called directly by the kernel while the
Gtk is in the DestroyWindow call. I currently see no way to not
let this happen.
Or maybe a big rewrite of the window procedure to stuff all its
messages in a queue of native messages from which gdk fetches
them, when it is ready to do so ...
>so I don't
>offhand have an idea of why my change would cause problems
>for you.
>
Previously the destroyed-state was set befor calling
_gdk_windowing_window_destroy which worked just fine.
Thanks,
Hans
-------- Hans "at" Breuer "dot" Org -----------
Tell me what you need, and I'll tell you how to
get along without it. -- Dilbert
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]